He is not as Christian as Cliffe Knechtle. I consider him an intellectual. He is basically talking to preserve the cultural identity in a specific geographical region. And it is as apparent as day he is talking for the west.
The problem is he is in the ego pyramid. His awareness will fluctuate on gender-race-nationality depending on the mood. But everybody accommodates that framework in their conversation. What is the difference?
Let us take John Lennox, for example. How does he differ from Jordan Peterson?
John Lennox is a Christian. Though he comes down to the "ego pyramid" in his conversation with "atheists," it is just a mere act for being nice to the person who is conversing with him. There is an interview with Atkins.
When you lack truth inside you, you will cling to an ingroup identity. It may be race or nationality. That is what Atkins was doing in one of the conversations with John Lennox. Whenever lennox atone with him on those sentiments, he is just showing you are not alone. "You are white; we both belong to each other," or "We both are from the same continent; we belong each other" That is the only thing he can do to a clown who doesn't know what he is doing.
But if you strip away all the ego identity from John Lennox that is gender, race, and nationaity he wont be affected, not even a bit. That is because his strength and identity lie in TRUTH.
That is the difference.
The identity of Jordan peterson lies in "being an intellectual."
Is he a racist/nationalist for talking for his race or nationality?
I don't think so.
But he is not a solid Christian like John Lennox or Cliffe Knechtle. Neither John nor Cliff cross Christ for their ego identity. But Peterson will.
But God will use the imperfect for his plans. Trump is one classic example.
I have never seen a toddler who weighs 236 pounds yielding so much power in this world. Lord God has forsaken all the so-called "adults" because they work for Satan, their father, now. Then he uses Trump. Same with Peterson.
No comments:
Post a Comment