It is the force architecture.
Nobody is doing it better than him. Some are very good in style. But style is not the core.
Most people are not getting it. Their beta brains can't dig it.
See some of the faces of Batman.
The muscles are stretched back without losing the form and proportions.
The planes of the faces are correct but tweaked to the extreme.
And his main thing is force architecture (gesture—for the beta brains and women). That is where he exceeds
It is almost the equivalent of getting an Oscar or the football World Cup. In our illustration business.
But if you are not getting it, don't be disappointed. Kubrick has never won an Oscar.
That is basically it.
If I am scoring above 950 in illustration, I will consider myself a success.
That is my thing.
Great works.
I will give him a score around 950 to 960
Very few artists who score above 950.
If you pass 900, then you are a AAA artist
If you pass 850, you are a professional.
I will score around 800 to 850 at this point in time. If you need any comparison.
Yes.
All the four quadrants are the same.
The major axis in the above picture is not passing through the center of the circle. This is an extremely distorted image. But proves the point.
But ChatGPT says there are some exceptions.
I am putting it in here for your genius brain to dig.
Understood.
Yes. That is mathematics. Not your juju artsy-fartsy stuff.
You are a stupid man. Admit it and be free
Edit 02 -07 - 2026
This is not that difficult to understand. I thought it was math and all. But it is not.
Just take a look at it.
You are going through a circle and how you will experience it. That is what the image is.
Beyond the critical position, a human won't be seeing a circle.
Because it works for me.
In many ways.
I don't want to logically deduce things into anything.
It simply works.
To some people it won't work.
But there must be something that works for each person.
Most atheists will reach a point where they believe in spirituality devoid of religion.
Am I going to do that?
It is like inventing mathematics all by myself. Don't you think it is just plain stupid?
But one thing you must do is very important.
If you have Christ inside you, do not distort that image.
Sometimes you may get some admiration from your fellow nerds. It is like frogs being in a pond.
It won't be good for you.
Analyze things. What is good for you and what is not.
I need a framework for my life. To keep me in check. That is the thing.
Do I believe nonmaterial beings exist?
Yes.
I believe that.
Beings that have their own automation, not affected by my thoughts or psychological condition.
My mind is not making things up.
That is reality. Once you have understood that reality, you cannot go back. It is like the veil has been pulled out.
I would like to be ignorant like in my old days. But I can't.
I want to sin without feeling any remorse or guilt like the old days. But now i can't
So the question that arises is whether the present condition a form of slavery or not.
To know that you must observe your life and analyze it.
Things are getting done.
Of course there is discomfort, but I am working in that discomfort.
If you are not a slave to God, then you are a slave to something else. And slowly it will end your life. Like that which happened to Nieztche.
And God asks you to be his son. So this is a better framework. Not like communism. Offering equality front hand and slaughtering backhand.
And I need some parameters to function properly.
At this point in my life I don't give a damn about what others are thinking. Because I have been lonely for too long. And I am not interested in this circus either.
If I am inside a dark prison and if God is there with me, that is a win for me. Right now.
Not such an attractive attitude for the youth and women in general.
But that is what I prefer.
Peace.
In its technical perfection the machine is giving a score of 8.7
With that being said, ChatGPT has no idea what that is which is emerging from the water.
Here I am providing what it says
Query: What is the object that is emerging from water
Chatgpt writes:
From this image alone, it's impossible to identify the object with certainty because the artist has painted it very loosely.
The most likely interpretations are:
A flower bud or water lily (most likely)
The shape resembles petals opening upward.
It emerges naturally from the water surface.
The composition supports a "discovery in nature" narrative.
A moth or butterfly with wings partially open
The silhouette could be read as wings.
However, there isn't enough wing structure to confidently identify it as an insect.
A fantasy creature or magical plant
The painting contains glowing fireflies and a mystical atmosphere.
The object may be intentionally ambiguous to create wonder.
A frog or small animal
Least likely.
The silhouette lacks recognizable anatomy.
My estimate:
Flower/water lily bud: ~60%
Fantasy magical plant: ~25%
Butterfly/moth: ~10%
Other: ~5%
The object is painted so close to the focal glow that its exact identity matters less than its role in the composition. Its primary purpose is to act as a visual focal point that the character is reaching toward, rather than to be clearly identifiable.
I have asked it because initially it said it was a butterfly.
If you are a human, it is an instant read.
You just have to see the thumbnail; you understand that.
That is art. That is real art.
The artist in here is tapping into the deep archetypal layers of the human psyche.
Even the blind will be so certain that it is a hand.
See, that is the point.
Now, this is an artwork.
When I see an artwork, man. I understand. Most Betabrians don't.
Betabrians are like ChatGPT. Despicable
Well, ChatGPT is not despicable. It is good in analysis. Technical analysis.
If the value is off, it tells. The structure is off, it understands.
But it cannot differentiate real art from all the other slops in here. That is the point.
The machine is giving an overall score of 8.7 for this piece.
The form is not solidly built around the architecture. It is implied in many areas, not fully constructed.
Very loose edge control but very good shape design.
That is the point. Line and shape come along together. If your edges fail, make it up in shape design.
I like the colors. And the composition is top tier. In fact, that is what is making this piece work.
I can only talk standing at my current skill level.
It will take 1 year of hard practice and structural training.
If you are in a range of 850 - 930, producing consistent works, you are pro.
Now you have to draw things that need to be drawn, not what you like.
That will create slow growth.
I have seen portfolios in ArtStation where they start at 900 and 10 years later are still 900.
They are rare, talented people.
But their talent is their obstruction.
Right now when I am learning to draw, it is becoming more and more difficult.
How difficult is it?
It is really difficult now.
like a 7/10 difficulty.
That difficulty level is going to increase after 6 months.
Now my range is around 700 to 800.
I can confidently bet on that.
Some of my paintings have gone far, passing the 850 range.
But I am not producing consistent works in the 850 range now.
When you produce 850 consistently, some artworks may push to 930 and above.
That is the truth.
Now, how does a 950 +art looks like.
Like the images of Feng Zhu. FZD school of art founder.
The technicality of all his images is exceptional.
Do I like his art?
No. But it doesn't matter whether I like it or not. It is top-notch.
I like someone like Simon Stålenhag and Bekinski.
