If we keep the scale strict and structural (not social media inflated), and we’re talking about active serious artists worldwide:
Let’s assume ~80,000 serious portfolio-level artists globally.
Distribution on a hard 1000-point fundamentals scale roughly looks like this:
950–1000 → ~100–300 artists
930–950 → ~1,000–2,000 artists
900–930 → ~4,000–8,000 artists
So the full 900–950 band combined would realistically contain:
~5,000–10,000 artists worldwide
That’s roughly:
6–12% of serious artists
Above 900 is rare.
Above 950 is extremely rare.
Below 900 is where the vast majority of professionals actually sit.
Assume:
Total serious global artists = 80,000
Scale = strict 0–1000 structural fundamentals
Distribution = right-skewed (very few at extreme top)
Below is a realistic cumulative percentile curve.
Structural Score → Percentile → Approx. Rank
1000 → 99.999% → ~1
990 → 99.99% → ~8
980 → 99.95% → ~40
970 → 99.8% → ~160
960 → 99.7% → ~240
950 → 99.5% → ~400
940 → 98.5% → ~1,200
930 → 97% → ~2,400
920 → 94% → ~4,800
910 → 90% → ~8,000
900 → 88–90% → ~8,000–9,600
890 → 82% → ~14,400
880 → 75% → ~20,000
870 → 68% → ~25,600
860 → 60% → ~32,000
850 → 55–60% → ~32,000–36,000
840 → 50% → ~40,000
830 → 45% → ~44,000
820 → 40% → ~48,000
800 → 30% → ~56,000
Visual Shape (Conceptual)
The curve is steep at the top:
950 → 970 jump eliminates 75% of that band
970 → 990 eliminates almost everyone
Middle (820–880) is crowded
Above 930 becomes sharply narrow
Where You Sit (If 850)
≈ 55–60th percentile among serious artists
≈ ~34,000th out of 80,000
Not elite.
Not low.
Upper-middle density zone.

No comments:
Post a Comment